This pamphlet has been prepared to acquaint you with the Office of
Professional Standards within the Cranston Police Department, and
the procedures for filing a complaint against the department, its
officers, or employees.
Complaints
Complaints can be due to dissatisfaction with Cranston Police
Department services, policies, procedures, or practices. Complaints
can also be for employee misconduct.
Misconduct includes:
-
Any criminal offense of federal, state, or local laws.
-
Neglect of duty
-
Violations of policy, procedure,
rule, or regulation.
-
Conduct which may tend to reflect unfavorably upon the employee
and/or the Cranston Police Department.
-
Civil rights violations, such as:
- Unlawful searches - False
arrest -
Excessive force
- Harassment
-
We prefer to have the individual or individuals directly involved
make the complaint in person.
-
Complaints in writing will be accepted.
-
Telephone, third party, and anonymous complaints will be
investigated to the extent possible using the information available
and without violating employee rights.
Complaints can be made directly to the Office of Professional
Standards, or to any supervisory officer of the Cranston Police
Department.
A complaint made to supervisory officers not assigned to the Office
of Professional Standards will be filled out on a Citizen Complaint
Report.
Some citizen complaints will be handled by the receiving supervisor,
while others will be forwarded directly to the Office of
Professional Standards.
All citizen complaints will be investigated and/or reviewed by the
Office of Professional Standards. The Office of Professional
Standards has the authority to report directly to Chief of Police,
and the Division keeps the Chief of Police informed of complaints
and allegations against the department, its officers, and other
employees.
Goals of the Complaint Process
To ensure the public is receiving efficient, fair, and impartial law
enforcement from the Cranston Police Department.
Ensure the Cranston Police Department maintains a professional
standard and reputation.
Protect employees from false allegations of misconduct.
Remove employees who engage in serious acts of misconduct, or who
have otherwise demonstrated that they are unfit for the law
enforcement profession.
Detection of flaws in policy, procedure or training, so they can be
corrected or improved upon.
Investigative Process
Once a complaint has been received it will be reviewed to determine:
-
The complaint type.
-
Whom or what is involved.
-
The available evidence pertaining to the complaint.
Along with physical evidence, testimonial evidence may be required.
Interviews with civilian witnesses and officers may be conducted.
If an officer is interviewed regarding an internal complaint, the
interview(s) must be conducted in accordance to the Law Enforcement
Officers’ Bill of Rights.
The Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights is state law that sets
requirements to be followed when conducting administrative
interviews, or the disciplining of officers.
When the physical and/or testimonial evidence has been gathered, it
will be examined and a conclusion will be drawn. That conclusion of
facts will lead to a recommendation.
The investigation, with its conclusion of facts and recommendation,
will be submitted to the Chief of Police for his/her review.
If a complaint against an employee is sustained, disciplinary action
will be taken against that employee.
Discipline can be:
- Verbal counseling
-A Letter of Reprimand
- Retraining
- A suspension without pay - Demotion
- Termination of employment
-
Acknowledgement of your complaint.
-
Your complaint to be honestly and fairly investigated, and
adjudicated.
-
Periodic status reports if the investigation of your complaint takes
an extended period of time.
-
Written notice of the final disposition of your case.
*A deliberate false report of officer misconduct may result in
criminal prosecution and/or you may be held civilly liable.
Cranston Police Department
Office of Professional Standards
(401) 942-2211
Colonel Stephen McGrath
Chief of Police